DarshanTalks Podcast

Why Your Consultant’s Report Is a Legal Liability

Darshan Kulkarni

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 1:37

Send us Fan Mail

In the high-stakes world of Life Science M&A, hiring expert consultants for GXP, IT, and data privacy is standard operating procedure. But there is a hidden structural flaw in most due diligence programs: Scope Creep. When a consultant identifies "high risk" in a data transfer mechanism, they aren't just giving a business metric—they are venturing into legal opinion. Without the protection of attorney-client privilege, these "compliance scorecards" and "heat maps" are discoverable goldmines for post-acquisition lawsuits and regulatory actions.

In this episode of KLF Deep Dive, we break down why all diligence must be commissioned and controlled through legal counsel. Learn how to transform operational findings into binding indemnities and ensure your next acquisition doesn't become your next legal nightmare.

Support the show

www.kulkarnilawfirm.com

Darshan

So, welcome back to KLF Deep Dive. Today we're talking about legally vetting their own due diligence reports. So, in the life sciences, we'll always hire expert consultants. They'll be responsible for GXP, IT data privacy. They're going to deliver compliance scorecards, the risk heat maps, and the operational fix. That's essential. But the reports are a business metric, not a legal shield. The problem is scope creep. When a consultant writes the data transfer mechanism is high risk, they've ventured into legal opinion territory. But because they're not licensed legal counsel, the report often lacks attorney-client privilege. This means that under the right circumstances, it can be discovered and used against you in post-acquisition lawsuits or a regulatory action. Here's why you need a due diligence program. All compliance and regulatory due diligence must be commissioned, controlled, and funneled through your legal team or through external legal counsel. This structure achieves two things. First, it helps to establish a claim of privilege over the sensitive findings. This will protect that information from discovery. Second, and most importantly, it ensures that your legal team and not the consultant is the one interpreting the legal liability and therefore drafting the binding indemnities and warranties in the purchasing agreement. Don't buy a target based on a consultant's clean rating. Ensure that your legal counsel has audited the facts, signed off on the liability. That's the only way to transform operational findings into transactional security. Called, click, or email.